Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs MSTAR M1
| Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | MSTAR M1 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 37524 | |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6753 | MediaTek MT6752 |
| Diagonal size | 5 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 2800 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 4 G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | No | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
| Notifications Led | Yes | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | |
| Material | Metal and plastic | |
| Weight | 140 g | g |
| Dimensions | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm | mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Discontinued.
View all MSTAR models here
Alternatives to the MSTAR M1: |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs MSTAR M1: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs MSTAR M1’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | MSTAR M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs MSTAR M1: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs MSTAR M1, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | MSTAR M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2800 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | |
| Talk time | 20 hours | |
| Fast charging | Yes | |
| Wireless charging |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs MSTAR M1: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 100.00% faster than the MSTAR M1, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs MSTAR M1: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the MSTAR M1 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and MSTAR M1? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the MSTAR M1 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 200mAh).
Why it is better not to take MSTAR M1 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro
MSTAR M1 related comparisons
- Compare Jumper Ezbook 3S vs TECLAST F7
- Compare TECLAST F7 vs Jumper Ezbook 3L Pro
- Compare Jumper Ezbook 3 Pro vs TECLAST F7
- Compare Meizu M6 vs MSTAR M1
- Compare TECLAST F7 vs T-bao TBOOK X8S PRO