0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb

Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb with Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb.

Name Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 50000 38695
CPU MediaTek MT6755 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 5.5 " 5 "
Resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 2 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model Omnivision OV13853
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 2 Mp
Battery 4100 mAh 5020 mAh
Wireless charging
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 6.0 Android 7.0
Material Metal Metal
Weight 163 g 149 g
Dimensions 153.6 x 75.5 x 8.2 mm 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Meizu models here
Alternatives to the Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb:
Meizu 18 Pro 8/128GB - Compare
Meizu 18s Pro 8/256GB - Compare
Meizu 18x 8/256GB - Compare
Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb:

Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Meizu M3 Note’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp Omnivision OV13853 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model Omnivision OV13853
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 2 Mp
Flash No

Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Meizu M3 Note vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Battery 4100 mAh 5020 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 6-7 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 25 hours 30 hours
Fast charging No Yes
Wireless charging

Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 50000 score points which is 29.22% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb
5.5 inches (1920x1080) Curved Glass / MT6755 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Omnivision OV13853 / 4100mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 87 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is -25.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 550 vs 603 (-8.79% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb
5.5 inches (1920x1080) Curved Glass / MT6755 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Omnivision OV13853 / 4100mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5020mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 29.22% faster in the Antutu test (11305 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp Omnivision OV13853 compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.

Why it is better not to take Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 14 grams less (149 vs 163).
  • More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4100mAh (a difference of 920mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Meizu M3 Note 2/16Gb related comparisons

Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.64/5 of 235
Frequent comparisons