Compare Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Meizu M6T 2/16Gb

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Meizu M6T 2/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb with Meizu M6T 2/16Gb.
Name	Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb	Meizu M6T 2/16Gb

Antutu benchmark	85188	46446
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 439	MediaTek MT6750
Diagonal size	5.71 "	5.7 "
Resolution	1520x720	1440x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	10
RAM	2 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Dual Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	3300 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 9.0	Android 7.1
Material	Plastic frame and glass case	Metal
Weight	161 g	145 g
Dimensions	149×71.3×8.4 mm	152,3 x 73 x 8,4 mm
Price	80.01€ ($91.84) See Details	67.91€ ($77.96) See Details

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Meizu M6T 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nokia 4.2’s camera vs Meizu M6T’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb	Meizu M6T 2/16Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No	No

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Meizu M6T 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 4.2 vs Meizu M6T, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb	Meizu M6T 2/16Gb
Battery	3000 mAh	3300 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	6-7 hours	6-7 hours
Talk time	25 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging	No

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Meizu M6T 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 85188 score points which is 83.41% faster than the Meizu M6T 2/16Gb, which got 46446. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb

5.71" (1520x720) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 439 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh

80.01€

$91.84

85188

Meizu M6T 2/16Gb

5.7" (1440x720) Curved Glass / MT6750 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3300mAh

67.91€

$77.96

46446

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs Meizu M6T 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 175 points score in "Single-core" of against the Meizu M6T 2/16Gb which got 124, it is 41.13% faster. In "Multi-core" score 798 vs 614 (29.97% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb

5.71" (1520x720) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 439 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh

80.01€

$91.84

175 / 798

Meizu M6T 2/16Gb

5.7" (1440x720) Curved Glass / MT6750 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3300mAh

67.91€

$77.96

124 / 614

What is the difference between Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb and Meizu M6T 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (advantages)

Good performance: Is 83.41% faster in the Antutu test (38742 score difference).
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1440x720.

Why it is better not to take Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Meizu M6T 2/16Gb (advantages)

Best weight: 16 grams less (145 vs 161).
More battery capacity: 3300mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 300mAh).

Why it is better not to take Meizu M6T 2/16Gb (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

Have fast charging supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb related comparisons

Meizu M6T 2/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 62

Frequent comparisons