0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Meizu M8C vs Uhans U300-1

Meizu M8C vs Uhans U300-1 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Meizu M8C with Uhans U300-1.

Name Meizu M8C Uhans U300-1
Meizu M8C Uhans U300-1
Antutu benchmark 33103
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 5.45 " 5.5 "
Resolution 1440x720 1920x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 5
RAM 2 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 16 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 3070 mAh 3000 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G G
Sim cards
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No
Operating system (OS) Android 7.1
Material Plastic
Weight 140 g g
Dimensions 146.4 x 70 x 8.5 mm mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Meizu models here
Alternatives to the Meizu M8C:
Meizu 18x 8/128GB - Compare
Meizu M10 - Compare
Meizu 18 Pro 12/256GB - Compare
Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Uhans models here
Alternatives to the Uhans U300-1:

Meizu M8C vs Uhans U300-1: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Meizu M8C’s camera vs Uhans U300-1’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Meizu M8C Uhans U300-1
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No

Meizu M8C vs Uhans U300-1: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Meizu M8C vs Uhans U300-1, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Meizu M8C Uhans U300-1
Battery 3070 mAh 3000 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 6-7 hours
Talk time 25 hours
Fast charging No
Wireless charging No

Meizu M8C vs Uhans U300-1: Antutu benchmark comparison. Meizu M8C vs Uhans U300-1: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Meizu M8C in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 33103 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Uhans U300-1, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Meizu M8C
5.45 inches (1440x720) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 425 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3070mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Uhans U300-1
5.5" (1920x1080) / MT6753 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

Meizu M8C vs Uhans U300-1: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Meizu M8C in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 126 points score in "Single-core" of against the Uhans U300-1 which got 115, it is 9.57% faster. In "Multi-core" score 427 vs 610 (-30.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Meizu M8C
5.45 inches (1440x720) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 425 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3070mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Uhans U300-1
5.5" (1920x1080) / MT6753 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

What is the difference between Meizu M8C and Uhans U300-1? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Meizu M8C (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
  • More battery capacity: 3070mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 70mAh).

Why it is better not to take Meizu M8C (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Uhans U300-1 (advantages)

  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1440x720.

Why it is better not to take Uhans U300-1 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Meizu M8C related comparisons

Uhans U300-1 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.38/5 of 16
Frequent comparisons