Compare Motorola Moto G Pro vs LG K42

Motorola Moto G Pro vs LG K42 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Motorola Moto G Pro with LG K42.
Name	Motorola Moto G Pro	LG K42

Antutu benchmark	151778	93188
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 665	MediaTek Helio P22
Diagonal size	6.4 "	6.6 "
Resolution	2300x1080	1600x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	10
RAM	4 Gb	3 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	Yes
ROM	128 GB	64 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	48 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Four cameras	Four cameras
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	4000 mAh	4000 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)	Android 10.0 (Q)
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	192 g	182 g
Dimensions	158.6 x 75.8 x 9.2 mm	165 x 76,7 x 8,4 mm
Price	196.00€ ($229.75) See Details	147.00€ ($172.31) See Details

Motorola Moto G Pro vs LG K42: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Motorola Moto G Pro’s camera vs LG K42’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Motorola Moto G Pro	LG K42
Rear camera	48 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	Double LED	No

Motorola Moto G Pro vs LG K42: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Motorola Moto G Pro vs LG K42, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Motorola Moto G Pro	LG K42
Battery	4000 mAh	4000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	6-7 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours	8-9 hours
Talk time	25 hours	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging	No	No

Motorola Moto G Pro vs LG K42: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Motorola Moto G Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 151778 score points which is 62.87% faster than the LG K42, which got 93188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Motorola Moto G Pro

6.4" (2300x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 665 / 4Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 4000mAh

196.00€

$229.75

151778

LG K42

6.6 inches (1600x720) Gorilla glass / Helio P22 / 3Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

147.00€

$172.31

93188

Motorola Moto G Pro vs LG K42: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Motorola Moto G Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 314 points score in "Single-core" of against the LG K42 which got 158, it is 98.73% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1393 vs 797 (74.78% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Motorola Moto G Pro

6.4" (2300x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 665 / 4Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 4000mAh

196.00€

$229.75

314 / 1393

LG K42

6.6 inches (1600x720) Gorilla glass / Helio P22 / 3Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

147.00€

$172.31

158 / 797

What is the difference between Motorola Moto G Pro and LG K42? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Motorola Moto G Pro (advantages)

Good performance: Is 62.87% faster in the Antutu test (58590 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 13Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 8Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 2300x1080 vs 1600x720.

Why it is better not to take Motorola Moto G Pro (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG K42 (advantages)

Best weight: 10 grams less (182 vs 192).

Why it is better not to take LG K42 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

NFC supports.
Have fast charging supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Motorola Moto G Pro related comparisons

LG K42 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.57/5 of 7

Frequent comparisons