Compare Motorola Moto G75 vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Name | Motorola Moto G75 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 572177 | 414772 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 6.7 " |
Resolution | 2412x1080 | 2340x1080 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 50 Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Triple Camera |
Sensor model | Sony LYT600 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Network | 5 G | 5 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | Yes |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 14 |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Weight | 205 g | 200 g |
Dimensions | 166.1 x 77.2 x 8.4 mm | 164.4 x 77.9 x 7.9 mm |
Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Motorola models here
Alternatives to the Motorola Moto G75: Motorola One Fusion - Compare Motorola Moto G13 - Compare Motorola Edge S 8/128Gb - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G: Samsung Galaxy A30S 4/64Gb - Compare Samsung Galaxy A73 5G 8/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A21s 4/64GB - Compare |
Motorola Moto G75 vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Motorola Moto G75’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony LYT600 sensor and the 50Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Motorola Moto G75 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 50 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony LYT600 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Motorola Moto G75 vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Motorola Moto G75 vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Motorola Moto G75 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
---|---|---|
Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Motorola Moto G75 vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Motorola Moto G75 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 572177 score points which is 37.95% faster than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, which got 414772. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Motorola Moto G75 vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Motorola Moto G75 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 998 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G which got 762, it is 30.97% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2887 vs 2331 (23.85% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Motorola Moto G75 and Samsung Galaxy A16 5G? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Motorola Moto G75 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 37.95% faster in the Antutu test (157405 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 13Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2412x1080 vs 2340x1080.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Motorola Moto G75 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (advantages)
- Best weight: 5 grams less (200 vs 205).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Motorola Moto G75 related comparisons
- Compare Motorola Moto G75 vs Motorola Moto G84
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A36 vs Motorola Moto G75
- Compare Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Motorola Moto G75
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G vs Motorola Moto G75
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A55 5G vs Motorola Moto G75
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A55 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A34 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A54 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G