Compare LG K40 vs Nokia 1.3
Name | LG K40 | Nokia 1.3 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 75447 | 35188 |
CPU | MediaTek Helio P22 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 |
Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 5.71 " |
Resolution | 1440x720 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 3000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 8.1 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Weight | 144 g | 155 g |
Dimensions | 153 x 71,9 x 8,3 mm | 147.3 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm |
Price | 100.55€ ($104.87) See Details | 79.95€ ($83.39) See Details |
LG K40 vs Nokia 1.3: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the LG K40’s camera vs Nokia 1.3’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | LG K40 | Nokia 1.3 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | LED flash | No |
LG K40 vs Nokia 1.3: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LG K40 vs Nokia 1.3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | LG K40 | Nokia 1.3 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 3000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
LG K40 vs Nokia 1.3: Antutu benchmark comparison.
LG K40 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 75447 score points which is 114.41% faster than the Nokia 1.3, which got 35188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
LG K40 vs Nokia 1.3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
LG K40 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 163 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 1.3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 797 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between LG K40 and Nokia 1.3? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG K40 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 114.41% faster in the Antutu test (40259 score difference).
- Best weight: 11 grams less (144 vs 155).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take LG K40 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 1.3 (advantages)
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1440x720.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 1.3 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
LG K40 related comparisons
- Compare LG K22 vs LG K40
- Compare LG K40 vs LG K8+
- Compare LG K40 vs LG K50
- Compare LG K61 vs LG K40
- Compare Doogee S55 Lite vs LG K40
Nokia 1.3 related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Reno Ace 2 vs Nokia 1.3
- Compare Nokia 1.4 vs Nokia 1.3
- Compare Nokia C1 Plus vs Nokia 1.3
- Compare Nokia 1.3 vs OnePlus N1
- Compare Apple iPhone XS Max vs Nokia 1.3