0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Nokia 1.3

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Nokia 1.3 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Samsung Galaxy A32 5G with Nokia 1.3.

Name Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Nokia 1.3
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Nokia 1.3
Antutu benchmark 290582 35188
CPU MediaTek Dimensity 720 Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
Diagonal size 6.5 " 5.71 "
Resolution 1600x720 1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 4 Gb 1 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 64 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Four cameras Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 13 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 5000 mAh 3000 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 5 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 10.0 (Q)
Material Plastic Plastic
Weight 205 g 155 g
Dimensions 164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm 147.3 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm
  Price 235.00€ ($251.37) See Details 79.95€ ($85.52) See Details

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Nokia 1.3: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G’s camera vs Nokia 1.3’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Nokia 1.3
Rear camera 48 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 13 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Nokia 1.3: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Nokia 1.3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Nokia 1.3
Battery 5000 mAh 3000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 5-6 days 1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode 14-15 hours 6-7 hours
Talk time 30 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No No

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Nokia 1.3: Antutu benchmark comparison. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Nokia 1.3: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 290582 score points which is 725.80% faster than the Nokia 1.3, which got 35188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
6.5 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Dimensity 720 / 4Gb / 64GB / 48Mp / 5000mAh
235.00€
$251.37
 
Nokia 1.3
5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 215 / 1Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3000mAh
79.95€
$85.52
 

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Nokia 1.3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 505 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 1.3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1659 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
6.5 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Dimensity 720 / 4Gb / 64GB / 48Mp / 5000mAh
235.00€
$251.37
 
Nokia 1.3
5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 215 / 1Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3000mAh
79.95€
$85.52
 

What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A32 5G and Nokia 1.3? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 725.80% faster in the Antutu test (255394 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1520x720.
  • More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 1.3 (advantages)

  • Best weight: 50 grams less (155 vs 205).

Why it is better not to take Nokia 1.3 (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G related comparisons

Nokia 1.3 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 370
Frequent comparisons