Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Nokia 1.3
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Nokia 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 326155 | 35188 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 5.71 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastic |
| Weight | 187 g | 155 g |
| Dimensions | 159,9 x 75,1 x 8,4 mm | 147.3 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Samsung Galaxy S21+ 8/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 8/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb - Compare |
79.95€ ($85.50) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Nokia 1.3: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G’s camera vs Nokia 1.3’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Nokia 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Nokia 1.3: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Nokia 1.3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Nokia 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Nokia 1.3: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 326155 score points which is 826.89% faster than the Nokia 1.3, which got 35188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Nokia 1.3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 613 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 1.3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1916 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Nokia 1.3? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 826.89% faster in the Antutu test (290967 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 1.3 (advantages)
- Best weight: 32 grams less (155 vs 187).
Why it is better not to take Nokia 1.3 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Nokia 1.3 related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Reno Ace 2 vs Nokia 1.3
- Compare Nokia 1.4 vs Nokia 1.3
- Compare Nokia C1 Plus vs Nokia 1.3
- Compare Nokia 1.3 vs OnePlus N1
- Compare Apple iPhone XS Max vs Nokia 1.3