Compare Nokia 2.3 vs LG K20
Name | Nokia 2.3 | LG K20 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 69311 | 34177 |
CPU | MediaTek Helio A22 | MediaTek MT6739 |
Diagonal size | 6.2 " | 5.45 " |
Resolution | 1520x720 | 960x480 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 10 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 4000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Weight | 183 g | 147 g |
Dimensions | 157.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm | 147 x 71,5 x 8,2 mm |
Price | 113.24€ ($129.99) See Details | 95.98€ ($110.18) See Details |
Nokia 2.3 vs LG K20: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 2.3’s camera vs LG K20’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Nokia 2.3 | LG K20 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Nokia 2.3 vs LG K20: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 2.3 vs LG K20, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Nokia 2.3 | LG K20 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | No | Yes |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Nokia 2.3 vs LG K20: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 2.3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 69311 score points which is 102.80% faster than the LG K20, which got 34177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 2.3 vs LG K20: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 2.3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the LG K20 which got 115, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 389 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 2.3 and LG K20? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.3 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 102.80% faster in the Antutu test (35134 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 960x480.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.3 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG K20 (advantages)
- Best weight: 36 grams less (147 vs 183).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take LG K20 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Nokia 2.3 related comparisons
- Compare Lenovo A7 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Nokia 6.1 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare OUKITEL C19 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Ulefone Note 9 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Nokia 2.3 vs Nokia 1.4
LG K20 related comparisons
- Compare LG K22 vs LG K20
- Compare LG K20 vs LG Q7
- Compare Huawei P50 vs LG K20
- Compare LG K20 vs Vivo U20
- Compare AGM A2 vs LG K20