0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Nokia 2.3

Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Nokia 2.3 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Oppo Reno Ace 3 with Nokia 2.3.

Name Oppo Reno Ace 3 Nokia 2.3
Oppo Reno Ace 3 Nokia 2.3
Antutu benchmark 641558 69311
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus MediaTek Helio A22
Diagonal size 6.59 " 6.2 "
Resolution 2400x1080 1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 12 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 512 GB 32 GB
External memory No MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 64 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Four cameras Dual Camera
Sensor model Sony IMX686
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4500 mAh 4000 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 5 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q) Android 10.0 (Q)
Material Metal frame and glass case Plastic
Weight g 183 g
Dimensions mm 157.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm
  Price Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Oppo models here
Alternatives to the Oppo Reno Ace 3:
Oppo Reno8 Pro 8/256GB - Compare
Oppo Find X3 Pro 8/256GB - Compare
Oppo Find X5 12/256GB - Compare
116.27€ ($124.34) See Details

Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Nokia 2.3: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Oppo Reno Ace 3’s camera vs Nokia 2.3’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Oppo Reno Ace 3 Nokia 2.3
Rear camera 64 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX686
Flash Dual LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Nokia 2.3: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Nokia 2.3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Oppo Reno Ace 3 Nokia 2.3
Battery 4500 mAh 4000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 8-9 hours
Talk time 30 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No No

Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Nokia 2.3: Antutu benchmark comparison. Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Nokia 2.3: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Oppo Reno Ace 3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 641558 score points which is 825.62% faster than the Nokia 2.3, which got 69311. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Oppo Reno Ace 3
6.59" (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 Plus / 12Gb / 512GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 4500mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Nokia 2.3
6.2 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
116.27€
$124.34
 

Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Nokia 2.3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Oppo Reno Ace 3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 949 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 2.3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3671 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Oppo Reno Ace 3
6.59" (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 Plus / 12Gb / 512GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 4500mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Nokia 2.3
6.2 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
116.27€
$124.34
 

What is the difference between Oppo Reno Ace 3 and Nokia 2.3? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Reno Ace 3 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 825.62% faster in the Antutu test (572247 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 13Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1520x720.
  • More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 500mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Oppo Reno Ace 3 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.3 (advantages)

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.3 (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Oppo Reno Ace 3 related comparisons

Nokia 2.3 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.33/5 of 3
Frequent comparisons