Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Nokia 2.3
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | Nokia 2.3 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 267699 | 69311 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 6.2 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Weight | 213 g | 183 g |
| Dimensions | 163,9 x 76,3 x 9,5 mm | 157.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M51: Samsung Galaxy A04 4/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 8/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro - Compare |
119.96€ ($125.12) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Nokia 2.3: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy M51’s camera vs Nokia 2.3’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | Nokia 2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Nokia 2.3: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Nokia 2.3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | Nokia 2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Nokia 2.3: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 267699 score points which is 286.23% faster than the Nokia 2.3, which got 69311. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Nokia 2.3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 382 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 2.3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1518 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy M51 and Nokia 2.3? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M51 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 286.23% faster in the Antutu test (198388 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 3000mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M51 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.3 (advantages)
- Best weight: 30 grams less (183 vs 213).
Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.3 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy M51 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy M31S
Nokia 2.3 related comparisons
- Compare Lenovo A7 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare OUKITEL C19 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Nokia 6.1 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Ulefone Note 9 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Cubot J9 vs Nokia 2.3