0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Nokia 3.1 vs Xiaomi Chiron

Nokia 3.1 vs Xiaomi Chiron Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nokia 3.1 with Xiaomi Chiron.

Name Nokia 3.1 Xiaomi Chiron
Nokia 3.1 Xiaomi Chiron
Antutu benchmark 41077
CPU MediaTek MT6750 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
Diagonal size 5.2 " 6 "
Resolution 1440x720 2160x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 10
RAM 2 Gb 8 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 32 GB 256 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 12 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Battery 3000 mAh 4500 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 8.0 (Oreo)
Material Metal frame and plastic case
Weight 138 g g
Dimensions 146.3 x 68.7 x 8.7 mm mm
  Price 67.39€ ($79.00) See Details Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Chiron:
Xiaomi Mi6X 4/32Gb - Compare
Xiaomi 12S Ultra 8/256GB Chinese version - Compare
Xiaomi Black Shark 8/128Gb - Compare

Nokia 3.1 vs Xiaomi Chiron: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nokia 3.1’s camera vs Xiaomi Chiron’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 12Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Nokia 3.1 Xiaomi Chiron
Rear camera 13 Mp 12 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Flash No No

Nokia 3.1 vs Xiaomi Chiron: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 3.1 vs Xiaomi Chiron, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Nokia 3.1 Xiaomi Chiron
Battery 3000 mAh 4500 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 1,5-2 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 6-7 hours 6-7 hours
Talk time 25 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No

Nokia 3.1 vs Xiaomi Chiron: Antutu benchmark comparison. Nokia 3.1 vs Xiaomi Chiron: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nokia 3.1 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 41077 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Xiaomi Chiron, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nokia 3.1
5.2 inches (1440x720) Curved Glass / MT6750 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh
67.39€
$79.00
 
Xiaomi Chiron
6" (2160x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 835 / 8Gb / 256GB / 12Mp / 4500mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

Nokia 3.1 vs Xiaomi Chiron: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nokia 3.1 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 121 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Chiron which got 385, it is -68.57% faster. In "Multi-core" score 505 vs 1680 (-69.94% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nokia 3.1
5.2 inches (1440x720) Curved Glass / MT6750 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh
67.39€
$79.00
 
Xiaomi Chiron
6" (2160x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 835 / 8Gb / 256GB / 12Mp / 4500mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

What is the difference between Nokia 3.1 and Xiaomi Chiron? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.1 (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 12Mp

Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.1 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have infrared blaster supports.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Chiron (advantages)

  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1440x720.
  • More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
  • Have infrared blaster supports.

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Chiron (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • NFC supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Nokia 3.1 related comparisons

Xiaomi Chiron related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 2
Frequent comparisons