Compare Nokia 3.2 3/32GB vs Nokia 2.2

Nokia 3.2 3/32GB vs Nokia 2.2 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nokia 3.2 3/32GB with Nokia 2.2.
Name	Nokia 3.2 3/32GB	Nokia 2.2

Antutu benchmark	78446	65499
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 429	MediaTek Helio A22
Diagonal size	6.26 "	5.71 "
Resolution	1520x720	1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	3 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	32 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	4000 mAh	3000 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 9.0	Android 9.0
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	181 g	153 g
Dimensions	159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm	146 x 70.6 x 9.3 mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Nokia models here Alternatives to the Nokia 3.2 3/32GB: Nokia 6.2 3/32Gb - Compare Nokia 1 Plus - Compare Nokia 4.2 3/32Gb - Compare	99.85€ ($115.73) See Details

Nokia 3.2 3/32GB vs Nokia 2.2: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nokia 3.2’s camera vs Nokia 2.2’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Nokia 3.2 3/32GB	Nokia 2.2
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

Nokia 3.2 3/32GB vs Nokia 2.2: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia 2.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Nokia 3.2 3/32GB	Nokia 2.2
Battery	4000 mAh	3000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours	5-6 hours
Talk time	25 hours	20 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No	No

Nokia 3.2 3/32GB vs Nokia 2.2: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nokia 3.2 3/32GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 78446 score points which is 19.77% faster than the Nokia 2.2, which got 65499. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nokia 3.2 3/32GB

180.97€

$209.74

78446

Nokia 2.2

5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh

99.85€

$115.73

65499

Nokia 3.2 3/32GB vs Nokia 2.2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nokia 3.2 3/32GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 167 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 2.2 which got 156, it is 7.05% faster. In "Multi-core" score 546 vs 563 (-3.02% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nokia 3.2 3/32GB

180.97€

$209.74

167 / 546

Nokia 2.2

5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh

99.85€

$115.73

156 / 563

What is the difference between Nokia 3.2 3/32GB and Nokia 2.2? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 3/32GB (advantages)

Good performance: Is 19.77% faster in the Antutu test (12947 score difference).
More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).

Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 3/32GB (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.2 (advantages)

Best weight: 28 grams less (153 vs 181).

Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.2 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Nokia 3.2 3/32GB related comparisons

Nokia 2.2 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons