Compare Nokia 3.2 3/32GB vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
| Name | Nokia 3.2 3/32GB | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 78446 | 78446 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 |
| Diagonal size | 6.26 " | 6.26 " |
| Resolution | 1520x720 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Weight | 181 g | 181 g |
| Dimensions | 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm | 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Nokia models here
Alternatives to the Nokia 3.2 3/32GB: Nokia 1.3 - Compare Nokia 3.4 - Compare Nokia 5.3 - Compare |
129.18€ ($149.20) See Details |
Nokia 3.2 3/32GB vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 3.2’s camera vs Nokia 3.2’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Nokia 3.2 3/32GB | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Nokia 3.2 3/32GB vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia 3.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Nokia 3.2 3/32GB | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Nokia 3.2 3/32GB vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 3.2 3/32GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 78446 score points which is 0.00% faster than the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB, which got 78446. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 3.2 3/32GB vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 3.2 3/32GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 167 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB which got 167, it is 0.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 546 vs 546 (0.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 3.2 3/32GB and Nokia 3.2 2/16GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 3/32GB (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 3/32GB (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Nokia 3.2 3/32GB related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 2.4 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 5.4 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia 3.1
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia 2.1
- Compare Nokia 5.3 vs Nokia 3.2
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 7 Plus vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia G21 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C1
- Compare Nokia 6.1 vs Nokia 3.2