Compare Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS
| Name | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB | Xiaomi Redmi 3SS |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 78446 | |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 |
| Diagonal size | 6.26 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1520x720 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 2 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | No | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
| Notifications Led | No | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | |
| Material | Plastic | |
| Weight | 181 g | 143 g |
| Dimensions | 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm | 139,3 x 69,6 x 8,5 mm |
| Price | 126.99€ ($146.35) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 4G 8/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 11s 6/128Gb NFC - Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 8/128Gb - Compare |
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 3.2’s camera vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB | Xiaomi Redmi 3SS |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No |
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 3.2 vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB | Xiaomi Redmi 3SS |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | |
| Talk time | 25 hours | |
| Fast charging | No | |
| Wireless charging | No |
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 78446 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 167 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS which got 114, it is 46.49% faster. In "Multi-core" score 546 vs 532 (2.63% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 3.2 2/16GB and Xiaomi Redmi 3SS? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS (advantages)
- Best weight: 38 grams less (143 vs 181).
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi 3SS (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 7 Plus vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C1
- Compare Nokia G21 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia X6 vs Nokia 3.2
Xiaomi Redmi 3SS related comparisons
- Compare TECLAST 98 vs VOYO Q101
- Compare TECLAST 98 vs TECLAST T10
- Compare TECLAST 98 vs CUBE iPlay 10
- Compare TECLAST X80 Pro vs TECLAST 98
- Compare TECLAST 98 vs TECLAST A10S