Compare Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs LG K50
Name | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb | LG K50 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 85188 | 76588 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | MediaTek Helio P22 |
Diagonal size | 5.71 " | 6.26 " |
Resolution | 1520x720 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 32 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 13 Mp |
Battery | 3000 mAh | 3500 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Plastic |
Weight | 161 g | 160 g |
Dimensions | 149×71.3×8.4 mm | 161,3 x 77 x 8,7 mm |
Price | 79.69€ ($91.84) See Details | 112.79€ ($129.98) See Details |
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs LG K50: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 4.2’s camera vs LG K50’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb | LG K50 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 13 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs LG K50: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 4.2 vs LG K50, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb | LG K50 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 3000 mAh | 3500 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs LG K50: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 85188 score points which is 11.23% faster than the LG K50, which got 76588. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs LG K50: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 175 points score in "Single-core" of against the LG K50 which got 161, it is 8.70% faster. In "Multi-core" score 798 vs 794 (0.50% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb and LG K50? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 11.23% faster in the Antutu test (8600 score difference).
- NFC supports.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG K50 (advantages)
- Best weight: 1 grams less (160 vs 161).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 8Mp .
- More battery capacity: 3500mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 500mAh).
Why it is better not to take LG K50 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Samsung Galaxy A01
- Compare MiGueR Note 10 vs Nokia 4.2
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs LG Q6
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Oppo A15
- Compare Nokia C30 vs Nokia 4.2
LG K50 related comparisons
- Compare Realme Z7 vs LG K50
- Compare LG K40 vs LG K50
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 vs LG K50
- Compare Doogee S60 vs LG K50
- Compare Vivo Z6 vs LG K50