Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb
Name | Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 432666 | 85188 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 |
Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5.71 " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
Battery | 4500 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | Yes |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Plastic frame and glass case |
Weight | 206 g | 161 g |
Dimensions | 164,8 x 76,4 x 8,4 mm | 149×71.3×8.4 mm |
Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G: Samsung Galaxy A41 4/64GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 6/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy M53 5G 8/128GB - Compare |
85.33€ ($91.84) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G’s camera vs Nokia 4.2’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Nokia 4.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4500 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 432666 score points which is 407.90% faster than the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb, which got 85188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 736 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb which got 175, it is 320.57% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2584 vs 798 (223.81% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 407.90% faster in the Antutu test (347478 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM1 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 45 grams less (161 vs 206).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs LG V50 ThinQ 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A72 5G
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Samsung Galaxy A01
- Compare MiGueR Note 10 vs Nokia 4.2
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs LG Q6
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Oppo A15
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip