Compare Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 223811 | 85188 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5.71 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic frame and glass case |
| Weight | 320 g | 161 g |
| Dimensions | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm | 149×71.3×8.4 mm |
| Price | 352.47€ ($366.46) See Details | 88.33€ ($91.84) See Details |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 9E’s camera vs Nokia 4.2’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 4.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 223811 score points which is 162.73% faster than the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb, which got 85188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 417 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb which got 175, it is 138.29% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1531 vs 798 (91.85% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 9E and Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9E (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 162.73% faster in the Antutu test (138623 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 3600mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9E (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 159 grams less (161 vs 320).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 9E related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Blackview BV9800 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 9 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6S vs Ulefone Armor 9E
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Samsung Galaxy A01
- Compare MiGueR Note 10 vs Nokia 4.2
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs LG Q6
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Oppo A15
- Compare Nokia C30 vs Nokia 4.2