0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Nokia X100 vs Nokia 2.1

Nokia X100 vs Nokia 2.1 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nokia X100 with Nokia 2.1.

Name Nokia X100 Nokia 2.1
Nokia X100 Nokia 2.1
Antutu benchmark 281288 31799
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Diagonal size 6.67 " 5.5 "
Resolution 2400x1080 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 6 Gb 1 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 128 GB 8 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 50 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Four cameras Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4470 mAh 4000 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 5 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 8.1
Material Plastic Plastic
Weight 217 g 155 g
Dimensions 171.44 x 79.7 x 9.1 mm 153,7 x 77,7 x 9.4 mm
  Price Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Nokia models here
Alternatives to the Nokia X100:
Nokia 3.1 - Compare
Nokia 5.3 - Compare
Nokia 3.4 - Compare
93.73€ ($99.99) See Details

Nokia X100 vs Nokia 2.1: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nokia X100’s camera vs Nokia 2.1’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Nokia X100 Nokia 2.1
Rear camera 50 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Nokia X100 vs Nokia 2.1: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia X100 vs Nokia 2.1, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Nokia X100 Nokia 2.1
Battery 4470 mAh 4000 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2.5 hours
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 8-9 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No No

Nokia X100 vs Nokia 2.1: Antutu benchmark comparison. Nokia X100 vs Nokia 2.1: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nokia X100 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 281288 score points which is 784.58% faster than the Nokia 2.1, which got 31799. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nokia X100
6.67 inches (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 480 / 6Gb / 128GB / 50Mp / 4470mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Nokia 2.1
5.5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 425 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 4000mAh
93.73€
$99.99
 

Nokia X100 vs Nokia 2.1: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nokia X100 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 504 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 2.1 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1627 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nokia X100
6.67 inches (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 480 / 6Gb / 128GB / 50Mp / 4470mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Nokia 2.1
5.5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 425 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 4000mAh
93.73€
$99.99
 

What is the difference between Nokia X100 and Nokia 2.1? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia X100 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 784.58% faster in the Antutu test (249489 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
  • More battery capacity: 4470mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 470mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Nokia X100 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.1 (advantages)

  • Best weight: 62 grams less (155 vs 217).
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.1 (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Nokia X100 related comparisons

Nokia 2.1 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 16
Frequent comparisons