0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Nokia X50 vs Nokia 2.1

Nokia X50 vs Nokia 2.1 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nokia X50 with Nokia 2.1.

Name Nokia X50 Nokia 2.1
Nokia X50 Nokia 2.1
Antutu benchmark 524886 31799
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Diagonal size 6.5 " 5.5 "
Resolution 3200x1440 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 8 Gb 1 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 128 GB 8 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 108 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Five cameras Single camera
Sensor model Samsung HM2
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 6000 mAh 4000 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 5 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 8.1
Material Metal frame and glass case Plastic
Weight g 155 g
Dimensions mm 153,7 x 77,7 x 9.4 mm
  Price Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Nokia models here
Alternatives to the Nokia X50:
Nokia 5.4 4/64GB - Compare
Nokia 3.1 - Compare
Nokia 2.4 3/64GB - Compare
93.30€ ($99.99) See Details

Nokia X50 vs Nokia 2.1: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nokia X50’s camera vs Nokia 2.1’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Nokia X50 Nokia 2.1
Rear camera 108 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model Samsung HM2
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Nokia X50 vs Nokia 2.1: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia X50 vs Nokia 2.1, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Nokia X50 Nokia 2.1
Battery 6000 mAh 4000 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2.5 hours
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 8-9 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No No

Nokia X50 vs Nokia 2.1: Antutu benchmark comparison. Nokia X50 vs Nokia 2.1: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nokia X50 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 524886 score points which is 1550.64% faster than the Nokia 2.1, which got 31799. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nokia X50
6.5 inches (3200x1440) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 780G / 8Gb / 128GB / 108Mp Samsung HM2 / 6000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Nokia 2.1
5.5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 425 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 4000mAh
93.30€
$99.99
 

Nokia X50 vs Nokia 2.1: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nokia X50 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 871 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 2.1 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2212 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nokia X50
6.5 inches (3200x1440) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 780G / 8Gb / 128GB / 108Mp Samsung HM2 / 6000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Nokia 2.1
5.5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 425 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 4000mAh
93.30€
$99.99
 

What is the difference between Nokia X50 and Nokia 2.1? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia X50 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 1550.64% faster in the Antutu test (493087 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 1280x720.
  • More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Nokia X50 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.1 (advantages)

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.1 (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Nokia X50 related comparisons

Nokia 2.1 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 22
Frequent comparisons