Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C11 Pro
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C11 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 40024 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek MT6739 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 5.45 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 1440x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal | Metal frame and plastic case |
| Weight | 139 g | 176 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 146,6 x 70 x 10,3 mm |
| Price | 350.05€ ($405.71) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C11 Pro: OUKITEL WP18 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP6 - Compare OUKITEL WP7 - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C11 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs OUKITEL C11 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C11 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C11 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C11 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C11 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C11 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 590.71% faster than the OUKITEL C11 Pro, which got 40024. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C11 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C11 Pro which got 150, it is 234.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 370 (436.76% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and OUKITEL C11 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 590.71% faster in the Antutu test (236424 score difference).
- Best weight: 37 grams less (139 vs 176).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 1440x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C11 Pro (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 3400mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 900mAh).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C11 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
OUKITEL C11 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs OUKITEL C11 Pro
- Compare Vernee T3 Pro vs OUKITEL C11 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C8 vs OUKITEL C11 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C11 Pro vs Doogee Y8
- Compare Meizu M8C vs OUKITEL C11 Pro