Compare Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs OUKITEL C11 Pro
Name | Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB | OUKITEL C11 Pro |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 671113 | 40024 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6739 |
Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 5.45 " |
Resolution | 2376x1080 | 1440x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 4500 mAh | 3400 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 8.1 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal frame and plastic case |
Weight | 196 g | 176 g |
Dimensions | 160 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm | 146,6 x 70 x 10,3 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB: Vivo X90 12/256GB - Compare Vivo X60 Pro+ 12/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO Neo6 8/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C11 Pro: OUKITEL C18 Pro - Compare OUKITEL C19 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP7 - Compare |
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs OUKITEL C11 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 5’s camera vs OUKITEL C11 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung GN1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB | OUKITEL C11 Pro |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs OUKITEL C11 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 5 vs OUKITEL C11 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB | OUKITEL C11 Pro |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4500 mAh | 3400 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs OUKITEL C11 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 671113 score points which is 1576.78% faster than the OUKITEL C11 Pro, which got 40024. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs OUKITEL C11 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 923 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C11 Pro which got 150, it is 515.33% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3346 vs 370 (804.32% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB and OUKITEL C11 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1576.78% faster in the Antutu test (631089 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung GN1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2376x1080 vs 1440x720.
- More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 3400mAh (a difference of 1100mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C11 Pro (advantages)
- Best weight: 20 grams less (176 vs 196).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C11 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Vivo NEX 3S vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Vivo S5 vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro Zoom Edition vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Vivo X30 Pro vs Vivo IQOO 5
OUKITEL C11 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs OUKITEL C11 Pro
- Compare Vernee T3 Pro vs OUKITEL C11 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C8 vs OUKITEL C11 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C11 Pro vs Doogee Y8
- Compare Meizu M8C vs OUKITEL C11 Pro