Compare Blackview BV6900 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 94338 | 22176 |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6757 Pro / Helio P25 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 5.84 " | 6.18 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 996x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5580 mAh | 3300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 284 g | 182 g |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 82.4 x 15 mm | 155,7 x 76 x 9,7 mm |
| Price | 109.99€ ($114.59) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: OUKITEL WP20 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP17 - Compare OUKITEL C35 - Compare |
Blackview BV6900 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV6900’s camera vs OUKITEL C12’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp Samsung S5K3P9 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BV6900 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV6900 vs OUKITEL C12, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5580 mAh | 3300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Blackview BV6900 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV6900 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 94338 score points which is 325.41% faster than the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb, which got 22176. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV6900 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV6900 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 178 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb which got 65, it is 173.85% faster. In "Multi-core" score 871 vs 222 (292.34% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV6900 and OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV6900 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 325.41% faster in the Antutu test (72162 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp Samsung S5K3P9 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 996x480.
- More battery capacity: 5580mAh vs 3300mAh (a difference of 2280mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV6900 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 102 grams less (182 vs 284).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Blackview BV6900 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9600E vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Blackview BV9600 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Doogee S90C vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare HT F801C vs Blackview BV6900
OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C12 Pro vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare OUKITEL C12 vs Doogee Y8
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom S16 vs OUKITEL C12