Compare Blackview BV9900E vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb
| Name | Blackview BV9900E | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 171897 | 22176 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 5.84 " | 6.18 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 996x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4380 mAh | 3300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 264 g | 182 g |
| Dimensions | 156.5 x 78.3 x 14.2 mm | 155,7 x 76 x 9,7 mm |
| Price | 242.48€ ($255.36) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: OUKITEL WP13 - Compare OUKITEL WP9 - Compare OUKITEL C19 Pro - Compare |
Blackview BV9900E vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV9900E’s camera vs OUKITEL C12’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BV9900E | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BV9900E vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV9900E vs OUKITEL C12, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BV9900E | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4380 mAh | 3300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Blackview BV9900E vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9900E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 171897 score points which is 675.15% faster than the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb, which got 22176. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV9900E vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9900E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 393 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb which got 65, it is 504.62% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1426 vs 222 (542.34% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV9900E and OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV9900E (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 675.15% faster in the Antutu test (149721 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 996x480.
- More battery capacity: 4380mAh vs 3300mAh (a difference of 1080mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV9900E (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 82 grams less (182 vs 264).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Blackview BV9900E related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9900 Pro vs Blackview BV9900E
- Compare Blackview BV9900E vs Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G
- Compare Blackview BV9700 Pro vs Blackview BV9900E
- Compare Blackview BV9900E vs Doogee S96 Pro
- Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Blackview BV9900E
OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C12 Pro vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare OUKITEL C12 vs Doogee Y8
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom S16 vs OUKITEL C12