Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 22176 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek MT6580 |
Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.18 " |
Resolution | 2280x1080 | 996x480 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 4 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 2500 mAh | 3300 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Network | 4 G | 3 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 8.1 |
Material | Metal | Plastic |
Weight | 139 g | 182 g |
Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 155,7 x 76 x 9,7 mm |
Price | 356.74€ ($367.91) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: OUKITEL WP5000 - Compare OUKITEL C31 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP1 - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs OUKITEL C12’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C12, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2500 mAh | 3300 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 1146.61% faster than the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb, which got 22176. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb which got 65, it is 670.77% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 222 (794.59% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1146.61% faster in the Antutu test (254272 score difference).
- Best weight: 43 grams less (139 vs 182).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 996x480.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 3300mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 800mAh).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C12 Pro vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare OUKITEL C12 vs Doogee Y8
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom S16 vs OUKITEL C12