Compare Ulefone Armor 3WT vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 148199 | 22176 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 6.18 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 996x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 3300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 364 g | 182 g |
| Dimensions | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm | 155,7 x 76 x 9,7 mm |
| Price | 248.96€ ($287.69) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: OUKITEL C19 - Compare OUKITEL WP27 - Compare OUKITEL WP5 3/32Gb - Compare |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera vs OUKITEL C12’s camera, see the difference between the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 3WT vs OUKITEL C12, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 3300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 148199 score points which is 568.29% faster than the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb, which got 22176. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 320 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb which got 65, it is 392.31% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1475 vs 222 (564.41% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 3WT and OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 568.29% faster in the Antutu test (126023 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 21Mp Sony IMX230 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 996x480.
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 3300mAh (a difference of 7000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 182 grams less (182 vs 364).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C12 Pro vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare OUKITEL C12 vs Doogee Y8
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom S16 vs OUKITEL C12