Compare Ulefone Armor 9 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9 | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 224199 | 22176 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 6.18 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 996x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 3300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 320 g | 182 g |
| Dimensions | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm | 155,7 x 76 x 9,7 mm |
| Price | 359.04€ ($384.05) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: OUKITEL C19 - Compare OUKITEL WP5 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP20 - Compare |
Ulefone Armor 9 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 9’s camera vs OUKITEL C12’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9 | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 9 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 9 vs OUKITEL C12, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9 | OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 3300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Ulefone Armor 9 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 224199 score points which is 911.00% faster than the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb, which got 22176. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 9 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 416 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb which got 65, it is 540.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1534 vs 222 (590.99% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 9 and OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 911.00% faster in the Antutu test (202023 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 996x480.
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 3300mAh (a difference of 3300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 138 grams less (182 vs 320).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 9 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9900 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7E vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare OUKITEL WP7 vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite vs Ulefone Armor 9
OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C12 Pro vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare OUKITEL C12 vs Doogee Y8
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom S16 vs OUKITEL C12