0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb

Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vivo IQOO 3 with OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb.

Name Vivo IQOO 3 OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb
Vivo IQOO 3 OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 588883 22176
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size 6.44 " 6.18 "
Resolution 2400x1080 996x480
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 8 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less Yes Yes
ROM 128 GB 16 GB
External memory No MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Four cameras Dual Camera
Sensor model Sony IMX582
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 13 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4440 mAh 3300 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 3 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q) Android 8.1
Material Metal frame and glass case Plastic
Weight 214 g 182 g
Dimensions 158.5 x 74.9 x 9.2 mm 155,7 x 76 x 9,7 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO 3:
Vivo iQOO Neo5 SE 8/128GB - Compare
Vivo IQOO 10 12/256GB - Compare
Vivo iQOO Neo5 SE 8/256GB - Compare
Discontinued. View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb:
OUKITEL WP12 - Compare
OUKITEL WP18 - Compare
OUKITEL C31 3/16GB - Compare

Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 3’s camera vs OUKITEL C12’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Vivo IQOO 3 OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX582
Flash Dual LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 13 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C12, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Vivo IQOO 3 OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb
Battery 4440 mAh 3300 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 6-7 hours
Talk time 30 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No No

Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vivo IQOO 3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 588883 score points which is 2555.50% faster than the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb, which got 22176. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vivo IQOO 3
6.44 inches (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp Sony IMX582 / 4440mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb
6.18 inches (996x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3300mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vivo IQOO 3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 924 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb which got 65, it is 1321.54% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3449 vs 222 (1453.60% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vivo IQOO 3
6.44 inches (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp Sony IMX582 / 4440mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb
6.18 inches (996x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3300mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 3 and OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 3 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 2555.50% faster in the Antutu test (566707 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 996x480.
  • More battery capacity: 4440mAh vs 3300mAh (a difference of 1140mAh).

Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 3 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 32 grams less (182 vs 214).

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vivo IQOO 3 related comparisons

OUKITEL C12 2/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.64/5 of 14
Frequent comparisons