Compare Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs OUKITEL C15 Pro +
| Name | Vivo X50 8/128Gb | OUKITEL C15 Pro + |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 326442 | 51133 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 6.08 " |
| Resolution | 2376x1080 | 1280x600 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX598 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 3200 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 173 g | 168 g |
| Dimensions | 159.5 × 75.4 × 7.5 mm | 156,1 x 73,7 x 9,5 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo X50 8/128Gb: Vivo V29 - Compare Vivo IQOO 10 Pro 12/256GB - Compare Vivo iQOO Neo5 SE 8/256GB - Compare |
85.60€ ($89.18) See Details |
Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs OUKITEL C15 Pro +: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo X50’s camera vs OUKITEL C15 Pro +’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX598 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo X50 8/128Gb | OUKITEL C15 Pro + |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX598 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs OUKITEL C15 Pro +: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo X50 vs OUKITEL C15 Pro +, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo X50 8/128Gb | OUKITEL C15 Pro + |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 3200 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs OUKITEL C15 Pro +: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo X50 8/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 326442 score points which is 538.42% faster than the OUKITEL C15 Pro +, which got 51133. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs OUKITEL C15 Pro +: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo X50 8/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 621 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C15 Pro + which got 161, it is 285.71% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1833 vs 538 (240.71% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo X50 8/128Gb and OUKITEL C15 Pro +? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo X50 8/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 538.42% faster in the Antutu test (275309 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX598 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2376x1080 vs 1280x600.
- More battery capacity: 4200mAh vs 3200mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo X50 8/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C15 Pro + (advantages)
- Best weight: 5 grams less (168 vs 173).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C15 Pro + (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Vivo X50 8/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vivo X60 vs Vivo X50
- Compare Oppo Reno 5 vs Vivo X50
- Compare Vivo X50 vs Vivo S9
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Vivo X50
- Compare Oppo Reno 5 Pro vs Vivo X50
OUKITEL C15 Pro + related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A vs OUKITEL C15 Pro +
- Compare OUKITEL C15 Pro vs OUKITEL C15 Pro +
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 7A vs OUKITEL C15 Pro +
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs OUKITEL C15 Pro +
- Compare Doogee N10 vs OUKITEL C15 Pro +