Compare Blackview BL8000 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
| Name | Blackview BL8000 | OUKITEL C16 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 536711 | 52117 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 5.71 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 512 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN5 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 8800 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 385 g | 153 g |
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.6 x 17 mm | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Blackview models here
Alternatives to the Blackview BL8000: Blackview A52 - Compare Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G - Compare Blackview BV6300 - Compare |
63.42€ ($73.29) See Details |
Blackview BL8000 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BL8000’s camera vs OUKITEL C16 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung GN5 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BL8000 | OUKITEL C16 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN5 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BL8000 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BL8000 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BL8000 | OUKITEL C16 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 8800 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Blackview BL8000 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BL8000 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 536711 score points which is 929.82% faster than the OUKITEL C16 Pro, which got 52117. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BL8000 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BL8000 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 816 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 Pro which got 161, it is 406.83% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2922 vs 538 (443.12% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BL8000 and OUKITEL C16 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BL8000 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 929.82% faster in the Antutu test (484594 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung GN5 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 8800mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 6200mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BL8000 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 Pro (advantages)
- Best weight: 232 grams less (153 vs 385).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Blackview BL8000 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G
- Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Blackview BV9900E
- Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Blackview A80s
- Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Blackview BV9500
- Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Blackview BV6800 Pro
OUKITEL C16 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Lenovo K5 Pro vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C16 Pro vs UMIDIGI A3S
- Compare OUKITEL C12 Pro vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare Vernee M3 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare Doogee N10 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro