Compare OUKITEL C16 Pro vs Nokia 1.3
Name | OUKITEL C16 Pro | Nokia 1.3 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 52117 | 35188 |
CPU | MediaTek Helio A22 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 |
Diagonal size | 5.71 " | 5.71 " |
Resolution | 1520x720 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 3 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 2600 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Weight | 153 g | 155 g |
Dimensions | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm | 147.3 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm |
Price | 63.29€ ($67.83) See Details | 79.95€ ($85.69) See Details |
OUKITEL C16 Pro vs Nokia 1.3: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL C16 Pro’s camera vs Nokia 1.3’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | OUKITEL C16 Pro | Nokia 1.3 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL C16 Pro vs Nokia 1.3: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL C16 Pro vs Nokia 1.3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | OUKITEL C16 Pro | Nokia 1.3 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2600 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Type | Removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
OUKITEL C16 Pro vs Nokia 1.3: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL C16 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 52117 score points which is 48.11% faster than the Nokia 1.3, which got 35188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL C16 Pro vs Nokia 1.3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL C16 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 161 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 1.3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 538 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL C16 Pro and Nokia 1.3? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 Pro (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 48.11% faster in the Antutu test (16929 score difference).
- Best weight: 2 grams less (153 vs 155).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 Pro (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 1.3 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 400mAh).
Why it is better not to take Nokia 1.3 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
OUKITEL C16 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Lenovo K5 Pro vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C16 Pro vs UMIDIGI A3S
- Compare Vernee M3 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C12 Pro vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare Doogee N10 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
Nokia 1.3 related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Reno Ace 2 vs Nokia 1.3
- Compare Nokia 1.4 vs Nokia 1.3
- Compare Nokia C1 Plus vs Nokia 1.3
- Compare Nokia 1.3 vs OnePlus N1
- Compare Apple iPhone XS Max vs Nokia 1.3