Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | OUKITEL C16 Pro |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 267699 | 52117 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | MediaTek Helio A22 |
Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5.71 " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 7000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Weight | 213 g | 153 g |
Dimensions | 163,9 x 76,3 x 9,5 mm | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M51: Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 8/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A31 4/64GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - Compare |
62.87€ ($67.84) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy M51’s camera vs OUKITEL C16 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | OUKITEL C16 Pro |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | OUKITEL C16 Pro |
---|---|---|
Battery | 7000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 5-6 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 267699 score points which is 413.65% faster than the OUKITEL C16 Pro, which got 52117. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 382 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 Pro which got 161, it is 137.27% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1518 vs 538 (182.16% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy M51 and OUKITEL C16 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M51 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 413.65% faster in the Antutu test (215582 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 4400mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M51 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 Pro (advantages)
- Best weight: 60 grams less (153 vs 213).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy M51 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy M31S
OUKITEL C16 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Lenovo K5 Pro vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C16 Pro vs UMIDIGI A3S
- Compare Vernee M3 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C12 Pro vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare Doogee N10 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro