Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs OUKITEL C16
Name | Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global | OUKITEL C16 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 612556 | 24945 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6580 |
Diagonal size | 6.59 " | 5.71 " |
Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 6000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 5 G | 3 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
Weight | 240 g | 153 g |
Dimensions | 171 x 78 x 9.8 mm | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Asus models here
Alternatives to the Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global: Asus ROG Phone 2 - Compare Asus Zenfone 9 8/128GB - Compare Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro 18/512GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C16: OUKITEL C19 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP12 - Compare OUKITEL WP20 - Compare |
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs OUKITEL C16: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global’s camera vs OUKITEL C16’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global | OUKITEL C16 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs OUKITEL C16: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs OUKITEL C16, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global | OUKITEL C16 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 6000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs OUKITEL C16: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 612556 score points which is 2355.63% faster than the OUKITEL C16, which got 24945. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs OUKITEL C16: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 927 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 which got 71, it is 1205.63% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3348 vs 213 (1471.83% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global and OUKITEL C16? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 2355.63% faster in the Antutu test (587611 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 3400mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 (advantages)
- Best weight: 87 grams less (153 vs 240).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro vs Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs Xiaomi Poco F3
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global vs Samsung Galaxy A72 5G
- Compare Realme C15 vs Asus ROG Phone 3 8/256 Global
OUKITEL C16 related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Blade A530 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL C16 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Cectdigi P35 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K7 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K10 vs OUKITEL C16