Compare Blackview BV6900 vs OUKITEL C16
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 94338 | 24945 |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6757 Pro / Helio P25 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 5.84 " | 5.71 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5580 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 284 g | 153 g |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 82.4 x 15 mm | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm |
| Price | 109.99€ ($117.33) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C16: OUKITEL WP28 - Compare OUKITEL WP16 - Compare OUKITEL WP7 - Compare |
Blackview BV6900 vs OUKITEL C16: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV6900’s camera vs OUKITEL C16’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp Samsung S5K3P9 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BV6900 vs OUKITEL C16: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV6900 vs OUKITEL C16, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5580 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Blackview BV6900 vs OUKITEL C16: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV6900 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 94338 score points which is 278.18% faster than the OUKITEL C16, which got 24945. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV6900 vs OUKITEL C16: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV6900 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 178 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 which got 71, it is 150.70% faster. In "Multi-core" score 871 vs 213 (308.92% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV6900 and OUKITEL C16? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV6900 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 278.18% faster in the Antutu test (69393 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp Samsung S5K3P9 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 5580mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 2980mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV6900 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 (advantages)
- Best weight: 131 grams less (153 vs 284).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Blackview BV6900 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9600E vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Blackview BV9600 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Doogee S90C vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare HT F801C vs Blackview BV6900
OUKITEL C16 related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Blade A530 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL C16 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Cectdigi P35 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K7 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K10 vs OUKITEL C16