Compare Samsung Galaxy F62 vs OUKITEL C16
| Name | Samsung Galaxy F62 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 441275 | 24945 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 9825 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5.71 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 218 g | 153 g |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy F62: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 12/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 8/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C16: OUKITEL U25 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP15 5G - Compare OUKITEL WP7 - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs OUKITEL C16: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy F62’s camera vs OUKITEL C16’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy F62 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs OUKITEL C16: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy F62 vs OUKITEL C16, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy F62 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs OUKITEL C16: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy F62 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 441275 score points which is 1668.99% faster than the OUKITEL C16, which got 24945. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs OUKITEL C16: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy F62 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 768 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 which got 71, it is 981.69% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2387 vs 213 (1020.66% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy F62 and OUKITEL C16? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy F62 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1668.99% faster in the Antutu test (416330 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 4400mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy F62 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 (advantages)
- Best weight: 65 grams less (153 vs 218).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy F62 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M31S vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy F62
OUKITEL C16 related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Blade A530 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL C16 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Cectdigi P35 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K10 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K7 vs OUKITEL C16