Compare Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16
| Name | Vivo IQOO 3 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 588883 | 24945 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.44 " | 5.71 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4440 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 214 g | 153 g |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 74.9 x 9.2 mm | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO 3: Vivo IQOO Neo7 12/256GB - Compare Vivo iQOO Neo5 SE 12/256GB - Compare Vivo iQOO Neo5 SE 8/128GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C16: OUKITEL C35 - Compare OUKITEL WP5 3/32Gb - Compare OUKITEL WP33 Pro - Compare |
Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 3’s camera vs OUKITEL C16’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 3 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 3 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4440 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 588883 score points which is 2260.73% faster than the OUKITEL C16, which got 24945. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO 3 vs OUKITEL C16: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 924 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 which got 71, it is 1201.41% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3449 vs 213 (1519.25% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 3 and OUKITEL C16? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 3 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 2260.73% faster in the Antutu test (563938 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 4440mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 1840mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 3 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 (advantages)
- Best weight: 61 grams less (153 vs 214).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vivo IQOO 3 related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO 3 vs OnePlus 8
- Compare Vivo IQOO 3 vs Xiaomi Mi 10
- Compare Vivo IQOO Pro vs Vivo IQOO 3
- Compare Vivo IQOO 3 vs Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play
- Compare Vivo IQOO 3 vs Xiaomi Redmi K30i
OUKITEL C16 related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Blade A530 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL C16 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Cectdigi P35 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K7 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K10 vs OUKITEL C16