Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C16
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 671218 | 24945 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 5.71 " |
| Resolution | 2376x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 197 g | 153 g |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 73.3 x 8.9 mm | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB: Vivo IQOO 12 - Compare Vivo IQOO Neo7 12/256GB - Compare Vivo X50 Pro+ 8/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C16: OUKITEL WP28 - Compare OUKITEL WP5000 - Compare OUKITEL WP55 Pro - Compare |
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C16: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro’s camera vs OUKITEL C16’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung GN1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C16: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro vs OUKITEL C16, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C16: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 671218 score points which is 2590.79% faster than the OUKITEL C16, which got 24945. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C16: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 924 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 which got 71, it is 1201.41% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3351 vs 213 (1473.24% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB and OUKITEL C16? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 2590.79% faster in the Antutu test (646273 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung GN1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2376x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 1400mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 (advantages)
- Best weight: 44 grams less (153 vs 197).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 5 vs Vivo IQOO 5 Pro
- Compare Vivo X60 Pro Plus vs Vivo IQOO 5 Pro
- Compare Vivo IQOO 7 Pro vs Vivo IQOO 5 Pro
- Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro vs Vivo V17
- Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro vs Vivo Y7s
OUKITEL C16 related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Blade A530 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL C16 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Cectdigi P35 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K10 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K7 vs OUKITEL C16