Compare Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs OUKITEL C16
Name | Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB | OUKITEL C16 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 671113 | 24945 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6580 |
Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 5.71 " |
Resolution | 2376x1080 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 4500 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 3 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
Weight | 196 g | 153 g |
Dimensions | 160 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB: Vivo S16 Pro - Compare Vivo Y100 - Compare Vivo iQOO Neo5 SE 8/128GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C16: OUKITEL WP5 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP6 - Compare OUKITEL WP20 Pro - Compare |
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs OUKITEL C16: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 5’s camera vs OUKITEL C16’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung GN1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB | OUKITEL C16 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs OUKITEL C16: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 5 vs OUKITEL C16, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB | OUKITEL C16 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4500 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs OUKITEL C16: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 671113 score points which is 2590.37% faster than the OUKITEL C16, which got 24945. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB vs OUKITEL C16: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 923 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 which got 71, it is 1200.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3346 vs 213 (1470.89% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB and OUKITEL C16? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 2590.37% faster in the Antutu test (646168 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung GN1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2376x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 1900mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 (advantages)
- Best weight: 43 grams less (153 vs 196).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Vivo IQOO 5 8/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Vivo NEX 3S vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Vivo S5 vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro Zoom Edition vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Vivo X30 Pro vs Vivo IQOO 5
OUKITEL C16 related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Blade A530 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL C16 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Cectdigi P35 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K7 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K10 vs OUKITEL C16