Compare Vivo IQOO Pro 5G vs OUKITEL C16
| Name | Vivo IQOO Pro 5G | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 42366 | 24945 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.41 " | 5.71 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 12 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 217 g | 153 g |
| Dimensions | 158.8 × 75.7 × 9.3 mm | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO Pro 5G: Vivo IQOO 8 Pro 12/512GB - Compare Vivo X Note 8/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 11 Pro 8/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C16: OUKITEL WP28 - Compare OUKITEL U23 - Compare OUKITEL C23 Pro - Compare |
Vivo IQOO Pro 5G vs OUKITEL C16: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO Pro 5G’s camera vs OUKITEL C16’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO Pro 5G | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 12 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO Pro 5G vs OUKITEL C16: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO Pro 5G vs OUKITEL C16, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO Pro 5G | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo IQOO Pro 5G vs OUKITEL C16: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO Pro 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 42366 score points which is 69.84% faster than the OUKITEL C16, which got 24945. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO Pro 5G vs OUKITEL C16: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO Pro 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 755 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 which got 71, it is 963.38% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2696 vs 213 (1165.73% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO Pro 5G and OUKITEL C16? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO Pro 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 69.84% faster in the Antutu test (17421 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 12Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 1900mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO Pro 5G (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 (advantages)
- Best weight: 64 grams less (153 vs 217).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vivo IQOO Pro 5G related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Axon 20 Pro 5G vs Vivo IQOO Pro 5G
- Compare Ulefone Armor 2 vs Vivo IQOO Pro 5G
- Compare Vivo S6 vs Vivo IQOO Pro 5G
- Compare Vivo NEX 3S vs Vivo IQOO Pro 5G
- Compare Vernee T3 Pro vs Vivo IQOO Pro 5G
OUKITEL C16 related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Blade A530 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL C16 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Cectdigi P35 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K10 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K7 vs OUKITEL C16