Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs OUKITEL C17 Pro
| Name | Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global | OUKITEL C17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 641773 | 91277 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus | MediaTek Helio P23 |
| Diagonal size | 6.59 " | 6.35 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 16 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 512 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 240 g | 193 g |
| Dimensions | 171 x 78 x 9.8 mm | 158 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Asus models here
Alternatives to the Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global: Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro 18/512GB - Compare Asus ROG Phone 2 - Compare Asus ROG Phone 6 8/128GB GLOBAL ROM - Compare |
89.56€ ($95.98) See Details |
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs OUKITEL C17 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global’s camera vs OUKITEL C17 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global | OUKITEL C17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs OUKITEL C17 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs OUKITEL C17 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global | OUKITEL C17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs OUKITEL C17 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 641773 score points which is 603.10% faster than the OUKITEL C17 Pro, which got 91277. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs OUKITEL C17 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 950 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C17 Pro which got 156, it is 508.97% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3583 vs 875 (309.49% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global and OUKITEL C17 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 603.10% faster in the Antutu test (550496 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1560x720.
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 3900mAh (a difference of 2100mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C17 Pro (advantages)
- Best weight: 47 grams less (193 vs 240).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C17 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global related comparisons
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 4 vs Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs Xiaomi Poco F3
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs Asus ROG Phone 5
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 3 16/512 Global vs Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
OUKITEL C17 Pro related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs UMIDIGI A5 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs Doogee N20
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 7 Global vs OUKITEL C17 Pro