Compare Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb vs OUKITEL C17
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 177833 | 82177 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 9611 | MediaTek Helio P23 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 6.35 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Weight | 172 g | 193 g |
| Dimensions | 158,5 x 73,6 x 7,9 mm | 158 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm |
| Price | 203.39€ ($217.98) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C17: OUKITEL WP5 3/32Gb - Compare OUKITEL C31 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP8 Pro - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb vs OUKITEL C17: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A51’s camera vs OUKITEL C17’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM2 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM2 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb vs OUKITEL C17: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A51 vs OUKITEL C17, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb vs OUKITEL C17: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 177833 score points which is 116.40% faster than the OUKITEL C17, which got 82177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb vs OUKITEL C17: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 327 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C17 which got 156, it is 109.62% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1121 vs 875 (28.11% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb and OUKITEL C17? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 116.40% faster in the Antutu test (95656 score difference).
- Best weight: 21 grams less (172 vs 193).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM2 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1560x720.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3900mAh (a difference of 100mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C17 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C17 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A51
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Global vs Samsung Galaxy A51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A51 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s vs Samsung Galaxy A51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A13 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A51
OUKITEL C17 related comparisons
- Compare UMIDIGI A5 Pro vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare OUKITEL C17 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare Ulefone Power 3s vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs OUKITEL C17