Compare Ulefone Armor 8E vs OUKITEL C17
| Name | Ulefone Armor 8E | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 142188 | 82177 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P23 | MediaTek Helio P23 |
| Diagonal size | 6.1 " | 6.35 " |
| Resolution | 1560x720 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5580 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 282 g | 193 g |
| Dimensions | 166 x 81.8 x 15 mm | 158 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Armor 8E: Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro - Compare Ulefone Power 3L - Compare Ulefone Armor 8 Pro 8/128Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C17: OUKITEL WP1 - Compare OUKITEL K12 6/64Gb - Compare OUKITEL WP23 - Compare |
Ulefone Armor 8E vs OUKITEL C17: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 8E’s camera vs OUKITEL C17’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 8E | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 8E vs OUKITEL C17: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 8E vs OUKITEL C17, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 8E | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5580 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Ulefone Armor 8E vs OUKITEL C17: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 8E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 142188 score points which is 73.03% faster than the OUKITEL C17, which got 82177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 8E vs OUKITEL C17: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 8E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 152 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C17 which got 156, it is -2.56% faster. In "Multi-core" score 744 vs 875 (-14.97% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 8E and OUKITEL C17? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 8E (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 73.03% faster in the Antutu test (60011 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- More battery capacity: 5580mAh vs 3900mAh (a difference of 1680mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 8E (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C17 (advantages)
- Best weight: 89 grams less (193 vs 282).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C17 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Ulefone Armor 8E related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 8E
- Compare Blackview BV9600 vs Ulefone Armor 8E
- Compare Doogee S90C vs Ulefone Armor 8E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Ulefone Armor 8E
- Compare Ulefone Armor X7 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 8E
OUKITEL C17 related comparisons
- Compare UMIDIGI A5 Pro vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare OUKITEL C17 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare Ulefone Power 3s vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs OUKITEL C17