0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare OUKITEL C25 vs Oppo A16

OUKITEL C25 vs Oppo A16 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of OUKITEL C25 with Oppo A16.

Name OUKITEL C25 Oppo A16
OUKITEL C25 Oppo A16
Antutu benchmark 138477 110994
CPU UNISOC Tiger T310 MediaTek Helio G35
Diagonal size 6.52 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1600x720 1600x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 4 Gb 4 Gb
Bezel-less Yes Yes
ROM 32 GB 64 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Triple Camera Four cameras
Sensor model Sony IMX135
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 11
Material Plastic Plastic
Weight g g
Dimensions mm mm
  Price 84.51€ ($97.60) See Details Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Oppo models here
Alternatives to the Oppo A16:
Oppo K1 6/64Gb - Compare
Oppo Reno 2Z - Compare
Oppo Reno7 5G CN 8/256GB - Compare

OUKITEL C25 vs Oppo A16: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL C25’s camera vs Oppo A16’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp Sony IMX135 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name OUKITEL C25 Oppo A16
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX135
Flash Dual LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Flash No No

OUKITEL C25 vs Oppo A16: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL C25 vs Oppo A16, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name OUKITEL C25 Oppo A16
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 8-9 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging No No
Wireless charging No No

OUKITEL C25 vs Oppo A16: Antutu benchmark comparison. OUKITEL C25 vs Oppo A16: Antutu benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C25 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 138477 score points which is 24.76% faster than the Oppo A16, which got 110994. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

OUKITEL C25
6.52 inches (1600x720) Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 32GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 5000mAh
84.51€
$97.60
 
Oppo A16
6.5 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Helio G35 / 4Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 5000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

OUKITEL C25 vs Oppo A16: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C25 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 297 points score in "Single-core" of against the Oppo A16 which got 177, it is 67.80% faster. In "Multi-core" score 984 vs 993 (-0.91% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

OUKITEL C25
6.52 inches (1600x720) Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 32GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 5000mAh
84.51€
$97.60
 
Oppo A16
6.5 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Helio G35 / 4Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 5000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

What is the difference between OUKITEL C25 and Oppo A16? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C25 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 24.76% faster in the Antutu test (27483 score difference).

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C25 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo A16 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Oppo A16 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

OUKITEL C25 related comparisons

Oppo A16 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 108
Frequent comparisons