Compare OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL U2

OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL U2 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of OUKITEL C35 with OUKITEL U2.
Name	OUKITEL C35	OUKITEL U2

Antutu benchmark	231352
CPU	UNISOC Tiger T616	MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size	6.56 "	5 "
Resolution	1600x720	960x540
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	12 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	256 GB	8 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb
Rear camera	50 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Single camera
Sensor model	Samsung S5KJN1
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	5150 mAh	2050 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 13
Material	Plastic
Weight	199 g	g
Dimensions	163.75 x 75.4 x 9.18 mm	mm
Price	137.48€ ($149.21) See Details	Discontinued. View all OUKITEL models here Alternatives to the OUKITEL U2: OUKITEL Mix 2 - Compare OUKITEL WP5000 - Compare OUKITEL WP7 - Compare

OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL U2: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL C35’s camera vs OUKITEL U2’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	OUKITEL C35	OUKITEL U2
Rear camera	50 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model	Samsung S5KJN1
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL U2: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL U2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	OUKITEL C35	OUKITEL U2
Battery	5150 mAh	2050 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes
Wireless charging	No

OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL U2: Antutu benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C35 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 231352 score points which is 100.00% faster than the OUKITEL U2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

OUKITEL C35

6.56 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Tiger T616 / 12Gb / 256GB / 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 / 5150mAh

137.48€

$149.21

231352

OUKITEL U2

5" (960x540) / MT6735 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2050mAh

0.00€

$0.00

OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL U2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C35 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 377 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL U2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1368 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

OUKITEL C35

6.56 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Tiger T616 / 12Gb / 256GB / 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 / 5150mAh

137.48€

$149.21

377 / 1368

OUKITEL U2

5" (960x540) / MT6735 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2050mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between OUKITEL C35 and OUKITEL U2? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C35 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 compared to 8Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 960x540.
More battery capacity: 5150mAh vs 2050mAh (a difference of 3100mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C35 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL U2 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL U2 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

OUKITEL C35 related comparisons

OUKITEL U2 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons