Compare OUKITEL C38 vs OUKITEL C19

OUKITEL C38 vs OUKITEL C19 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of OUKITEL C38 with OUKITEL C19.
Name	OUKITEL C38	OUKITEL C19

Antutu benchmark	216838	38166
CPU	MediaTek MT8788	MediaTek MT6737
Diagonal size	6.6 "	6.49 "
Resolution	2408x1080	1560x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	6 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	256 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	48 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Triple Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	5150 mAh	4000 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	No	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 13	Android 10.0 (Q)
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	199 g	200 g
Dimensions	164.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm	168 x 78 x 9.4 mm
Price	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all OUKITEL models here Alternatives to the OUKITEL C38: OUKITEL C31 3/16GB - Compare OUKITEL WP28 - Compare OUKITEL K7 Pro - Compare	64.60€ ($69.23) See Details

OUKITEL C38 vs OUKITEL C19: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL C38’s camera vs OUKITEL C19’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	OUKITEL C38	OUKITEL C19
Rear camera	48 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

OUKITEL C38 vs OUKITEL C19: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL C38 vs OUKITEL C19, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	OUKITEL C38	OUKITEL C19
Battery	5150 mAh	4000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	6-7 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours	8-9 hours
Talk time	30 hours	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging	No	No

OUKITEL C38 vs OUKITEL C19: Antutu benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C38 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 216838 score points which is 468.14% faster than the OUKITEL C19, which got 38166. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

OUKITEL C38

On Sale Soon

216838

OUKITEL C19

6.49 inches (1560x720) Glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

64.60€

$69.23

38166

OUKITEL C38 vs OUKITEL C19: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C38 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 327 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C19 which got 106, it is 208.49% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1462 vs 363 (302.75% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

OUKITEL C38

On Sale Soon

327 / 1462

OUKITEL C19

6.49 inches (1560x720) Glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

64.60€

$69.23

106 / 363

What is the difference between OUKITEL C38 and OUKITEL C19? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C38 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 468.14% faster in the Antutu test (178672 score difference).
Best weight: 1 grams less (199 vs 200).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 13Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 1560x720.
More battery capacity: 5150mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1150mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C38 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C19 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C19 (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

OUKITEL C38 related comparisons

OUKITEL C19 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons