Compare OUKITEL C50 vs OUKITEL C19

OUKITEL C50 vs OUKITEL C19 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of OUKITEL C50 with OUKITEL C19.
Name	OUKITEL C50	OUKITEL C19

Antutu benchmark	373633	38166
CPU	MediaTek Dimensity 6100+	MediaTek MT6737
Diagonal size	6.8 "	6.49 "
Resolution	1600x720	1560x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	8 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	128 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	50 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Triple Camera
Sensor model	Samsung S5KJN1
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	5150 mAh	4000 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	5 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	No	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 14	Android 10.0 (Q)
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	208 g	200 g
Dimensions	167.5 x 77.7 x 8.9 mm	168 x 78 x 9.4 mm
Price	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all OUKITEL models here Alternatives to the OUKITEL C50: OUKITEL WP1 - Compare OUKITEL WP8 Pro - Compare OUKITEL Mix 2 - Compare	65.33€ ($74.97) See Details

OUKITEL C50 vs OUKITEL C19: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL C50’s camera vs OUKITEL C19’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	OUKITEL C50	OUKITEL C19
Rear camera	50 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model	Samsung S5KJN1
Flash	LED flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

OUKITEL C50 vs OUKITEL C19: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL C50 vs OUKITEL C19, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	OUKITEL C50	OUKITEL C19
Battery	5150 mAh	4000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	6-7 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours	8-9 hours
Talk time	30 hours	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging	No	No

OUKITEL C50 vs OUKITEL C19: Antutu benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C50 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 373633 score points which is 878.97% faster than the OUKITEL C19, which got 38166. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

OUKITEL C50

On Sale Soon

373633

OUKITEL C19

6.49 inches (1560x720) Glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

65.33€

$74.97

38166

OUKITEL C50 vs OUKITEL C19: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C50 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 651 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C19 which got 106, it is 514.15% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2000 vs 363 (450.96% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

OUKITEL C50

On Sale Soon

651 / 2000

OUKITEL C19

6.49 inches (1560x720) Glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

65.33€

$74.97

106 / 363

What is the difference between OUKITEL C50 and OUKITEL C19? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C50 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 878.97% faster in the Antutu test (335467 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 compared to 13Mp
Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1560x720.
More battery capacity: 5150mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1150mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C50 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C19 (advantages)

Best weight: 8 grams less (200 vs 208).

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C19 (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

OUKITEL C50 related comparisons

OUKITEL C19 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons