Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C8
Name | Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB | OUKITEL C8 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 671218 | 21668 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6580 |
Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 5.5 " |
Resolution | 2376x1080 | 1280x640 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
RAM | 12 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 4000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | 3 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
Weight | 197 g | 145 g |
Dimensions | 159.6 x 73.3 x 8.9 mm | 147 x 70,6 x 10,2 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB: Vivo S16 - Compare Vivo iQOO Z8 5G - Compare Vivo X90 8/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C8: OUKITEL WP1 - Compare OUKITEL WP27 - Compare OUKITEL WP18 - Compare |
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C8: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro’s camera vs OUKITEL C8’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung GN1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB | OUKITEL C8 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No | LED flash |
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C8: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro vs OUKITEL C8, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB | OUKITEL C8 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C8: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 671218 score points which is 2997.74% faster than the OUKITEL C8, which got 21668. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C8: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 924 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C8 which got 65, it is 1321.54% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3351 vs 222 (1409.46% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB and OUKITEL C8? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 2997.74% faster in the Antutu test (649550 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung GN1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2376x1080 vs 1280x640.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C8 (advantages)
- Best weight: 52 grams less (145 vs 197).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C8 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 5 vs Vivo IQOO 5 Pro
- Compare Vivo X60 Pro Plus vs Vivo IQOO 5 Pro
- Compare Vivo IQOO 7 Pro vs Vivo IQOO 5 Pro
- Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro vs Vivo V17
- Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro vs Vivo Y7s
OUKITEL C8 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs OUKITEL C8
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs OUKITEL C8
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs OUKITEL C8
- Compare Uhans MX vs OUKITEL C8
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs OUKITEL C8