Compare OUKITEL K7000 vs THL 2015A

OUKITEL K7000 vs THL 2015A Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of OUKITEL K7000 with THL 2015A.
Name	OUKITEL K7000	THL 2015A

Antutu benchmark	29122	27911
CPU	MediaTek MT6737	MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size	5 "	5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	2 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	5 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model		Sony IMX135
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	2 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	2000 mAh	2700 mAh
Wireless charging
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 6.0	Android 5.1
Material	Metal frame and plastic case	Plastic
Weight	158 g	143 g
Dimensions	144.70 x 71.70 x 8.65 mm	144.6 x 71.6 x 7.5 mm
Price	Discontinued. View all OUKITEL models here Alternatives to the OUKITEL K7000: OUKITEL C35 - Compare OUKITEL WP9 - Compare OUKITEL K16 - Compare	Discontinued. View all THL models here Alternatives to the THL 2015A:

OUKITEL K7000 vs THL 2015A: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL K7000’s camera vs THL 2015A’s camera, see the difference between the 5Mp sensor and the 13Mp Sony IMX135 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	OUKITEL K7000	THL 2015A
Rear camera	5 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model		Sony IMX135
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	2 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No	No

OUKITEL K7000 vs THL 2015A: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL K7000 vs THL 2015A, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	OUKITEL K7000	THL 2015A
Battery	2000 mAh	2700 mAh
Type	Removable	Removable
Stand-by time	4-5 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	1,5-2 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	4-5 hours	5-6 hours
Talk time	20 hours	20 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging

OUKITEL K7000 vs THL 2015A: Antutu benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL K7000 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 29122 score points which is 4.34% faster than the THL 2015A, which got 27911. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

OUKITEL K7000

5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 5Mp / 2000mAh

0.00€

$0.00

29122

THL 2015A

5" (1280x720) Glass / MT6735 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2700mAh

59.63€

$68.87

27911

OUKITEL K7000 vs THL 2015A: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL K7000 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the THL 2015A which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

OUKITEL K7000

5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 5Mp / 2000mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

THL 2015A

5" (1280x720) Glass / MT6735 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2700mAh

59.63€

$68.87

0 / 0

What is the difference between OUKITEL K7000 and THL 2015A? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL K7000 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 4.34% faster in the Antutu test (1211 score difference).

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL K7000 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the THL 2015A (advantages)

Best weight: 15 grams less (143 vs 158).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp Sony IMX135 compared to 5Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
More battery capacity: 2700mAh vs 2000mAh (a difference of 700mAh).

Why it is better not to take THL 2015A (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

OUKITEL K7000 related comparisons

THL 2015A related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.66/5 of 201

Frequent comparisons