Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL K9
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | OUKITEL K9 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 267699 | 82987 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | MediaTek Helio P35 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 7.12 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2244x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX298 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal frame and plastic case |
| Weight | 213 g | g |
| Dimensions | 163,9 x 76,3 x 9,5 mm | mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M51: Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 16/512GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 8/512GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A60 6/128Gb - Compare |
145.83€ ($155.99) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL K9: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy M51’s camera vs OUKITEL K9’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 16Mp Sony IMX298 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | OUKITEL K9 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX298 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL K9: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL K9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | OUKITEL K9 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL K9: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 267699 score points which is 222.58% faster than the OUKITEL K9, which got 82987. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs OUKITEL K9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 382 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL K9 which got 175, it is 118.29% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1518 vs 642 (136.45% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy M51 and OUKITEL K9? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M51 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 222.58% faster in the Antutu test (184712 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 16Mp Sony IMX298
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2244x1080.
- More battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 6000mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M51 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL K9 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL K9 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy M51 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy M31S
OUKITEL K9 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs OUKITEL K9
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Global vs OUKITEL K9
- Compare Xiaomi Mi Max 3 vs OUKITEL K9
- Compare OUKITEL K9 vs UMIDIGI F1 Play
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs OUKITEL K9